EORTC QLQ C30 ESPAOL PDF
Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life in Mexican. Conclusiones: el EORTC QLQ-C30 (versión ) se ha mostrado como un Spanish. EORTC QLQ-C RESULTS: Multitrait scaling analysis showed that most. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (in all versions), and the modules which supplement it, are Requests for permission to use the EORTC QLQ-C30 or to reproduce or.
|Published (Last):||8 March 2006|
|PDF File Size:||12.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.98 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
These results showed the QLQ-C30 is highly sensitivity to changes. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that most item-scale correlation coefficients met the standards of convergent and discriminant validity.
Data collection procedures Patients completed the QLQ-C30 on the first and last day of radiotherapy, and one month and a half after the end of this particular treatment. Exceptions were items 20 and 25 in the first measurement, and 4, 14 and 15 in the second. Sociodemographic and clinical data were taken from the clinical records. Acknowledgements This study has received the support of a grant from the Health Department of the Gobierno de Navarra.
Most scales fulfilled the reliability criteria, except CF and NV. This sample consisted of patients with localized disease T1-T3 N0 M0 who started radiotherapy with radical intention epaol or not with hormotherapy at the Radiotherapeutic Oncology Department of the Hospital of Espzol. Most scales had low to moderate correlations with the other scales. Validation study for spanish prostate cancer patients. Validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients”. These interscale correlations and known group analyses expaol in line with our previous and other studies 1, Low correlations were found between NV with PF The highest correlations were between FA and PF – 0.
Introduction Quality of Life QL assessment plays a key role in the evaluation and treatment of cancer patients nowadays.
Materials and methods Participants A consecutive sample of prostate cancer patients was included. Interscale correlation coefficients were somewhat higher in the second measurement.
In the validation study of version 3. Few errors appeared, and they were mainly related to the cognitive functioning scale, as in our previous validation and in the Zhao and Kanda 16 studies. Quality of Life QL assessment plays a key role in the evaluation and treatment of cancer patients nowadays.
The comparisons between the different measurements were satisfactory as they had clinical significance. Patients’ characteristics qls compliance patients from a total of that were addressed filled in the first questionnaire, fspaol the second one and answered the third one. Group comparison analyses were satisfactory, as they were in line with the clinical data: Patients completed the QLQ-C30 version 3.
EORTC Quality of Life website | EORTC Quality of Life Group website : EORTC – Quality of Life
A sample of prostate cancer patients prospectively filled in the questionnaire three times: These instruments can also be used in clinical practice. Interscale correlations were calculated to study discriminant validity Two-tail analysis. Patients completed the QLQ-C30 on the first and last day of radiotherapy, and one month and a half after the end of this particular treatment.
There was also a significant improvement between the second and third measurements, and between the first and the third in SL. Se han dado pocas excepciones, principalmente en la escala CF. Most scales had low to moderate inter-correlations. We compared subgroups based on KPS levels: The structure of this questionnaire is presented in Table I.
One of the major tasks of this group is the development of questionnaires for the assessment of QL in clinical trials. The aims of this study are to determine the psychometric properties of the QLQ-C30 version 3.
Few exceptions appeared mainly in CF. New studies with other tumors could have a confirmatory value. Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents; ; Colombia University, New York, Item discriminant validity was successful in all analyses except in item 5 higher correlation with SF than with its own scaleitem 10 higher correlation with PF in the first measurement, and in the second assessment, item 20 higher correlations with EF and SF.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
Performance status – KPS was assessed by the physician at different time-points using the Karnofsky scale 8. This QL group has created a combined assessment system composed of a generic core questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, which evaluates issues common to different cancer sites and treatments, and a range of supplementary modules designed to assess specific issues, according to type of treatment or disease site, or to dimensions like fatigue.
Known group comparison analysis was performed by means of the Mann-Whitney U tests. This study has received the support of a grant from the Health Department of the Gobierno de Navarra. A consecutive sample of prostate cancer patients was included. These three analyses were performed at the first and second assessments. Multitrait scaling analyses confirmed the psychometric structure of the questionnaire, and were in line with previous studies There was a significant worsening in CF and SF between the first and second measurements, and in GQL between the second and third measurements.
Results Patients’ characteristics and compliance patients from a total of that were addressed filled in the first questionnaire, did the second one and answered the third one.
Cronbach’s coefficients of the scales were above 0. Internal consistence reliability estimates of the QLQ-C30 scales were above the 0.