GEERTZ DEEP PLAY NOTES ON THE BALINESE COCKFIGHT PDF
clifford geertz: “deep play: notes on the balinese cockfight” summary and review to start form the bottom line, clifford geertz’s essential notion expressed in. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” is one of Clifford Geertz’s most influential articles which illustrates not only the meaning of a given. Perhaps one of the most widely read anthropological essays, “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” by Clifford Geertz is available.
|Published (Last):||28 July 2006|
|PDF File Size:||11.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.45 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight by Clifford Geertz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. To ask of any cultural text, be it a cockfight or a folktale, who is talking, who is being talked to, what is being coxkfight about, and what form of action is being called for, is to move cultural analysis to a new level that renders the old antinomies of materialism and idealism irrelevant. William Roseberry thinks cockfigjt. Notify me of new comments via email.
The last half of the essay describes the rituals of betting and concludes that the cockfight is the Balinese comment on themselves, as it embodies the network of social relationships in kin and village that govern traditional Balinese life.
Cultural Reader: Clifford Geertz: “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” – summary and review
On December 31 and January 1 the Museum is closed. Has an Indonesian scholar written a reaction to the piece? Works cited in this post: To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: More Geertz online at HyperGeertz. To start form the bottom line, Clifford Geertz ‘s essential notion expressed in ” Deep Play: Geertz distinguishes “deep fights”, with high wages, and “shallow fights”, usually with low wages of both gambling and prestige.
This aspect is the most striking for me. With this in mind, I believe that one should take the time to look at the rich culture of the East, and only then feel entitled to engage in a discussion about the merits of the cultural heritage of the civilized versus the one of the primitive, of the savage.
Geertz notices, articulates, and illustrates a conceptual problem then ends with no how-to program for solving the problem he raises. To come round full circle, it may be worth remembering the material and political conditions of fieldwork in the s, 60s and 70s.
Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight
The idea of culture as a set of symbols that we share back and forth seems almost custom-designed to avoid the kinds of political economic analysis Rola and myself would like to see.
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
Email required Address never made public. We may have moved away from the type of culturalism that ignores the political and economic context, but it seems pretty banal to point this out, at least cockright American anthropology French anthropology being another story. But it is a momentary gain or lost, the statues is only gained or lost momentarily following the fight but is maintained in the long run, with cockfights assisting balinse making sure of that. I find it particularly troubling that Roseberry, ostensibly a political economist, also manages to elide this political context of the contemporary cockfights in favour of some of the economic aspects of their history which I grant is important, but no more important than the contemporary context.
When he talks about culture as text, the text is fully material, like words printed in a book. Jones Methews March 13, at 4: Sure, we can find plenty of things wrong with it now, but it remains pretty incredible: Tye material may be challenged and removed.
Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight – Wikipedia
This story serves two purposes: The first cockfight that he and his wife viewed was broken up by the police. Subscribe to our mailing list and get the latest news from Garage. Tagged as baliclifford geertzcockfightdeep playperformance.
As the three of us came tumbling into the courtyard, his wife, who had apparently been through this sort of thing before, whipped out a table, a tablecloth, three chairs, and three cups of tea, and we all, without any explicit communication whatsoever, sat down, commenced to sip tea, and sought to compose ourselves.
Social tensions are represented through the cockfight, but after all, it’s just a cockfight. Considered Geertz’s most seminal work, the essay addresses the meaning of cockfighting in Balinese culture.
This explains to some extent the rules behind a cockfight, particularly the fact that the winner is obliged to take the carcass of the dead cock and cook it for his family. Like a lot of people I read the Balinese cockfight article in my anthropological youth and I remember enjoying it although the Person, Time, and Conduct essay in that same volume was the one that really captured my attention.
From January 7 it will be open as usual. However, Geertz reminds us, neither winning nor losing in a cockfight can actually change the social status of the participant, remaining but a metaphor of real success of failure.